Vulnerability and revictimization: Victim characteristics in a Dutch assault center

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2017.08.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Sexual and family violence victims share characteristics that point at vulnerability.

  • Reporting rates decrease when the perpetrator is a recent contact.

  • Care for victims of sexual and family violence could be combined in a single assault center.

  • The needs of victims in regard to follow up care and reporting deserve future research.

Abstract

Sexual and family violence are highly prevalent problems with numerous negative health consequences. Assault centres, such as the Centre for Sexual and Family Violence (CSFV) in the Netherlands, have been set up to provide optimal care to victims. We wanted to gain insight into characteristics of the population that presented to the Centre in order to customize care to their needs. File analysis was conducted of victims who attended the CSFV between 2013 and 2016. Data were analyzed in SPSS. A total of 121 victims entered the Centre, 93% of them being female. Forty-two per cent were adult victims of sexual violence, 28% minor victims of sexual violence and 30% adult victims of family violence. One-third of sexual and two-third of family violence victims had experienced prior abuse. Current use of psychosocial services and psychiatric medication was high, and a cognitive disability was present in 18% of the sexual violence victims. Half the victims reported, but when the perpetrator was a recent contact, e.g., someone met at a party, reporting rates went down. Sexual and family violence victims share characteristics that indicate vulnerability, suggesting that care for both groups might best be combined in one single assault centre. In this way, victims can make use of the same services and knowledge of gender-based violence. One of the major aims of assault centres is to provide psychosocial follow-up care and facilities for reporting. The victims' needs in these matters deserve further research.

Introduction

In the Netherlands, one in eight women and one in twenty-five men have ever been raped,1 and 45% experienced a form of family violence.2 Sexual and family violence cause numerous negative health problems such as sexually transmitted infections (STIs), pregnancy complications and unwanted pregnancies, depression, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), substance abuse and an increased risk of suicide.3, 4, 5

Unfortunately, many victims do not seek help from legal, medical and mental health services. Victims are afraid that formal systems will not help them or will psychologically harm them.6 When they do seek formal help, the care provided often does not meet the victims' medical and psychological needs. Victims often perceive the care providers' attitudes and communication as negative.7 Instead of feeling they are given the opportunity to press charges, they are ashamed, are afraid of the perpetrator and fear they will be blamed by the police, who will probably not take the assault seriously enough.8, 9 Most reported sexual assaults are not prosecuted in court.7 As a consequence, victims feel misunderstood and miss out on the care they need.

To improve care for victims of violence, assault centres have been set up. In these centres, medical, psychosocial and legal services work together to provide the best possible care. Assault centres report promising outcomes on victims' help-seeking experiences: victims are satisfied with the care providers' attitude; care providers indicate that their communication skills have improved, resulting in a less traumatic care process; legal outcomes appear to improve; and there is enhanced communication among collaborating organizations.10, 11

A Centre for Sexual and Family Violence (CSFV) was set up in Nijmegen in 2012 as one of the first assault centres in the Netherlands. The Centre provides medical, forensic and police care at an Emergency Department. A case manager conducts psychosocial follow-up care to prevent problems such as PTSD, depression and revictimization. Literature on whether or not services for sexual and family violence should be combined shows that these services share needs, goals and expertise, but there is some concern that combined services lead to diminished effectiveness, lack of attention and lack of funding for sexual assault specifically.12 We believe that care for these victims could be based on the same interprofessional, integrated approach. Both family and sexual violence are considered gender-based violence: both share risk factors and health consequences, and both evoke feelings of fear, shame and guilt and increase the risk of future violence.13, 14, 15, 16 Both victim groups are often characterized by vulnerability, defined as being female, being young, having an intellectual disability or suffering from mental illnesses.17, 18

We wanted to find out whether our three target groups, namely adult and minor victims of sexual violence and adult victims of family violence, share background characteristics and care needs. Our research questions are: 1. What are the similarities and differences between adult victims of sexual and family violence with regard to vulnerabilities and use of services? 2. What are the similarities and differences between minor and adult victims of sexual assault with regard to vulnerabilities and use of services? 3. Do victim, assault and perpetrator characteristics influence reporting rates? This knowledge of assault centre populations can help existing and new centres to improve their care delivery.

Section snippets

Setting

The study was performed at the Centre for Sexual and Family Violence Nijmegen (CSFV), which provides interprofessional care for victims of sexual and family violence. The CSFV was set up as a collaborative network involving the Emergency Department (ED) of the Radboud University Medical Center, the District Police Department, the Community Health Services and an academic Primary Health Care Centre. Acute care takes place at the ED and is conducted by an ED physician and nurse. Initially, urgent

Results

In its first three years, 121 victims of acute sexual and/or family violence presented to the Centre for Sexual and Family Violence (Table 1). Seventy per cent of these had experienced sexual violence. Their male-female ratio was 1:16. Forty per cent were minor victims. The majority of victims had undergone vaginal, oral and/or anal penetration. One in five had been assaulted by more than one perpetrator.

Thirty per cent was a victim of family violence with a male-female ratio 1:11. Most victims

Discussion

Our most important finding is that victims of sexual violence and family violence show similar characteristics that indicate vulnerability: they are female, have high rates of psychosocial problems and/or intellectual disability and, in many cases, have experienced prior abuse. Remarkably, minor victims of sexual violence show the same characteristics. Despite their young age, a considerable percentage of them have experienced prior violence and have seen the involvement of Child Protection

Conclusion

Both minor and adult victims of sexual and family violence belong to vulnerable groups that are prone to revictimization. Combined care in one assault centre ensures that victims can make use of the same services and knowledge of gender-based violence. One of the major aims of assault centres is to prevent revictimization, which might be facilitated by adequate psychosocial follow-up care and reporting. The victims' needs in these matters deserve further research.

Conflict of interest statement

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

References (54)

  • H. Abedr-Rahman et al.

    Role of forensic medicine in evaluating non-fatal physical violence against women by their husbands in Jordan

    J Forensic Leg Med

    (2017)
  • D. Ackerman et al.

    Sexual assault victims: factors associated with follow-up care

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (2006)
  • M.M. Holmes et al.

    Follow-up of sexual assault victims

    Am J Obstet Gynecol

    (1998)
  • J. Hall et al.

    Drug facilitated sexual assault–a review

    J Forensic Leg Med

    (2008)
  • L.J. Anderson et al.

    A global epidemiological perspective on the toxicology of drug-facilitated sexual assault: a systematic review

    J Forensic Leg Med

    (April 2017)
  • C.T. Hagemann et al.

    Ethanol and drug findings in women consulting a Sexual Assault Center–Associations with clinical characteristics and suspicions of drug-facilitated sexual assault

    J Forensic Leg Med

    (2013)
  • C. Brooker et al.

    Mental health risk factors in sexual assault: what should Sexual Assault Referral Centre staff be aware of?

    J Forensic Leg Med

    (2016)
  • C.D. Creighton et al.

    Psychological profiles of adult sexual assault victims

    J Forensic Leg Med

    (2012)
  • C. Brooker et al.

    Mental health, sexual violence and the work of Sexual Assault Referral centres (SARCs) in England

    J Forensic Leg Med

    (2015)
  • O. Ingemann-Hansen et al.

    Characteristics of victims and assaults of sexual violence–improving inquiries and prevention

    J Forensic Leg Med

    (2009)
  • S. de Haas et al.

    Prevalence and characteristics of sexual violence in The Netherlands, the risk of revictimization and pregnancy: results from a national population survey

    Violence Vict

    (2012)
  • T. Van Dijk et al.

    Domestic violence: a national study of the nature, size and effects of domestic violence in The Netherlands

    Eur J Crim Policy Res

    (1998)
  • J. McFarlane et al.

    Intimate partner sexual assault against women and associated victim substance use, suicidality, and risk factors for femicide

    Issues Ment Health Nurs

    (2005)
  • D. Patterson et al.

    Understanding rape survivors' decisions not to seek help from formal social systems

    Health Soc Work

    (2009)
  • R. Campbell

    The psychological impact of rape victims

    Am Psychol

    (2008)
  • M. Thompson et al.

    Reasons for not reporting victimizations to the police: do they vary for physical and sexual incidents?

    J Am Coll Health

    (2007)
  • R.B. Felson et al.

    The reporting of domestic violence and sexual assault by nonstrangers to the police

    J marriage Fam

    (2005)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Association between ambient temperature and sex offense: A case-crossover study in seven large US cities, 2007–2017

      2021, Sustainable Cities and Society
      Citation Excerpt :

      Countries with different social contexts, cultural backgrounds, laws against sex offenders, women’s social status, and climatic characteristics might see different associations. Secondly, a significant proportion of sex offenses were unreported to the police and thus were missed by our study (Weiss, 2010; Welch & Mason, 2007; Zijlstra et al., 2017). This may cause an underestimation of the temperature-sex offenses association.

    • Reporting after sexual violence: The influence of victim, assault and perpetrator characteristics

      2021, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Victims also frequently struggle to understand how reporting might help them or protect them from the perpetrator, lack knowledge of the post-assault legal procedures and distrust the police.13,14 Little is known about the characteristics of victims, perpetrators and care that might impact the victims' reporting decision.12,14,15 As we aimed to enhance our understanding of the characteristics that influenced the victims' decision to report or not to report, our research questions are: 1.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text