Division of Clinical Forensic Medicine, Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine, 57-83 Kavanagh Street, Southbank, VIC 3006, Australia
Received 4 October 2011; accepted 9 December 2011.
Abstract
•The sexual assault consultation is a high-risk procedure with the potential for errors resulting in harm to both patients and staff. As such, it can be likened to practices in high-risk industries such as aviation and surgery. In contrast to these domains however, the focus on performance safety and Threat and Error Management has not been widely adopted. This is despite a growing recognition of the vulnerabilities of the investigative and prosecutorial stages of alleged sexual assaults.
•In the context of “high risk” sexual assault consultations, the notion of safety refers not only to the risk of patient morbidity and mortality, but also to physical, psychological and judicial outcomes that affect patients, staff, and the wider community.
•This article identifies the latent threats present in sexual assault consultations and suggests a conceptual framework for application of Threat and Error Management in this specialised area of medicine. This will enable practitioners to be better equipped to recognise the risks and improve the performance and safety of sexual assault consultation processes.
•In an era of growing medicolegal concerns regarding issues such as environmental safety and the potential for contamination of cases, focussing on education and safety culture components within the investigative systems will allow sexual assault consultation processes to progress towards a new level of organisational reliability.
Keywords: Sexual assault, Risk, Error, Safety, Contamination
PII: S1752-928X(11)00224-1
doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2011.12.002
© 2011 Elsevier Ltd and Faculty of Forensic and Legal Medicine. All rights reserved.
