Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume 17, Issue 6 , Pages 293-297, August 2010

The use of infrared aided photography in identification of sites of bruises after evidence of the bruise is absent to the naked eye

  • Peter Rowan, MSc, FRCP (General Practitioner)

      Affiliations

    • The Thatched House, Green Lane, Tivetshall St Margaret, Norfolk NR15 2BJ, UK
  • ,
  • Michael Hill, PhD, FRCP (Physician)

      Affiliations

    • The White Trillium, Stevenstone, Torrington, Devon EX38 7HY, UK
  • ,
  • G.A. Gresham, Sc.D, FRCPath (Professor)

      Affiliations

    • Late Emeritus Professor of Morbid Anatomy and Histopathology, University of Cambridge, UK
  • ,
  • Edward Goodall, PhD, NTF (Senior Lecturer)

      Affiliations

    • School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Northern Ireland BT52 1SA, UK
  • ,
  • Tara Moore, MSc, PhD (Fellow Professor)

      Affiliations

    • School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Northern Ireland BT52 1SA, UK
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author at: School of Biomedical Sciences, University of Ulster, Rm W1055, CMB, Cromore Road, Coleraine, Northern Ireland BT52 1SA, UK. Tel.: +44 28 70324577; fax: +44 28 70324375.

Received 19 August 2009; received in revised form 15 February 2010; accepted 1 April 2010.

Abstract 

The purpose of the study was to determine whether Infrared imaging could play a role in the detection of previous blunt force injury after resolution of skin changes were no longer visible to the human eye. Investigations were performed using an adapted digital camera and the same standard Nikon camera body to photograph the bruises of ten volunteer adult subjects. The same lens was fitted to each camera body and each bruise was photographed until it was no longer possible to identify it with the naked eye.

The results of photographing subjects over 6 months demonstrated that the median time the bruises persisted in both groups was approximately between 18 and 19 days. There was no statistically significant difference between groups of bruises photographed with both the infrared digital camera that had been adapted to capture only infrared light, and with the standard camera which had the same lens fitted to it.

The two groups of photographs of bruises imaged at the same time with the two cameras were not significantly different with regard to what skin changes could be detected. The use of the near infrared spectrum, with wavelengths that are longer than the human eye can detect, did not reveal significant evidence of bruising after it had faded from view to both the human eye and to a standard camera.

Keywords: Infrared, Digital photography, RAW, JPEG, Nikon NX, Adobe Photoshop CS3

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1752-928X(10)00059-4

doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2010.04.007

Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume 17, Issue 6 , Pages 293-297, August 2010