Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume 16, Issue 3 , Pages 148-151, April 2009

What constitutes a normal ante-mortem urine GHB concentration?

  • Francesco Mari (Study Design and Supervision)

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Toxicology Division, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Legal Medicine, University of Florence, Italy
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel./fax: +39 0557947208.
  • ,
  • Lucia Politi, PhD (Data Elaboration and Manuscript Writing)

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Toxicology Division, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Legal Medicine, University of Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • Claudia Trignano, MD

      Affiliations

    • Institute of Legal Medicine, University of Sassari, Italy
  • ,
  • Maria Grazia Di Milia, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Toxicology Division, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Legal Medicine, University of Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • Marianna Di Padua, MD (Development and Performance of Analytical Procedures)

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Toxicology Division, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Legal Medicine, University of Florence, Italy
  • ,
  • Elisabetta Bertol (Study Design and Supervision)

      Affiliations

    • Forensic Toxicology Division, Department of Anatomy, Histology and Legal Medicine, University of Florence, Italy

Received 25 March 2008; received in revised form 30 July 2008; accepted 16 August 2008.

Abstract 

Gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) is endogenously produced within the central nervous system, however it is also used as a medication for the treatment of a variety of clinical conditions, sold under the name Zyrem™ in the United States and Alcover® in Europe. It is a very dangerous drug with a very limited safety margin, and is classified as a controlled substance in many countries. The interpretation of post-mortem studies of GHB concentrations is problematic; GHB can be detected in urine and blood from non-GHB users, both before and after death, and concentrations in both matrices may rise with prolonged storage. Because it is produced as a post-mortem artifact, forensically defensible cut-offs for post-mortem blood concentrations have yet to be established. Given the enormous degree of inter and intra-individual variation in GHB production that has been documented, it is unlikely they ever will. The important issue for forensic scientists is whether the detection of GHB in urine, in concentrations above some yet to be determined value, can be used as evidence for drug facilitated assault. In an attempt to see if a cut-off level could be determined we analyzed urine from 39 alcoholics who were being treated with known oral doses of Alcover® (group 1), and compared the results with concentrations found in the urine of 30 volunteers who had no exogenous GHB intake (group 2), and 30 urine specimens taken from the alcoholics before they initiated GHB therapy (Alcover® treatment group 3). More than one third (36.6%) of subjects being treated with GHB were found to have urinary GHB concentration that fell between 2.75 and 10μg/mL. The data suggests that caution must be used when applying the currently used cut-off of 10μg/mL.

Keywords: GHB, Urine, Cut-off

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1752-928X(08)00178-9

doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2008.08.014

Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume 16, Issue 3 , Pages 148-151, April 2009