Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume 14, Issue 8 , Pages 453-455, November 2007

An audit of the use of definitions of sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS)

Discipline of Pathology, Level 3, Medical School North, The University of Adelaide, Frome Road, Adelaide 5005, Australia

Received 11 August 2006; received in revised form 18 November 2006; accepted 18 November 2006.

Abstract 

Given that there are a number of contradictions in the SIDS literature and that the definition of SIDS that was relied upon to authenticate cases in reports is not always specified, an audit of publications was undertaken. Fifty papers dealing with SIDS that were published in 2005 were reviewed. The majority (58%) of reports had either not specified a definition of SIDS, or had used non-standard or idiosyncratic definitions. Of the papers that had documented a definition: 30% used the 1989 NICHD definition, 10% used the 2004 San Diego definition, and 2% used the 1969 Seattle definition. Failure to use standard published definitions of SIDS and/or to clearly specify the definition that has been followed may severely hamper the evaluation of SIDS research.

Keywords: Sudden infant death syndrome, Definition, Research, Audit

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1752-928X(06)00250-2

doi:10.1016/j.jflm.2006.11.003

Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume 14, Issue 8 , Pages 453-455, November 2007