Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume 14, Issue 5 , Pages 261-265 , July 2007

A grey zone approach for evaluation of 15 short tandem repeat loci in sibship analysis: A pilot study in Indian subjects

  • Rajiv I. Giroti, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Plot No. 2, Dakshin Marg, Sector 36-A, Chandigarh 160 036, India
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +91 172 2621441; fax: +91 172 2605923.
  • ,
  • Sunita Verma, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Plot No. 2, Dakshin Marg, Sector 36-A, Chandigarh 160 036, India
  • ,
  • Kulwant Singh, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Plot No. 2, Dakshin Marg, Sector 36-A, Chandigarh 160 036, India
  • ,
  • Rohit Malik, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Central Forensic Science Laboratory, Plot No. 2, Dakshin Marg, Sector 36-A, Chandigarh 160 036, India
  • ,
  • Indu Talwar, PhD ((Professor and Chair))

      Affiliations

    • Department of Anthropology, Panjab University, Chandigarh 160 014, India

Received 8 May 2006 ,Revised 8 August 2006 ,Accepted 10 August 2006.

References 

  1. Sasaki M, Shiono H, fukushima T, Shimizu K. Human Identification by genotyping of personal articles. Forensic Sci Int. 1997;90:65–75
  2. Wenk RE, Traver M, Chiafari FA. Determination of sibship in any two persons. Transfusion. 1996;36:259–262
  3. Kimpton CP, Oldroyd NJ, Watson SK, Frazier RR, Johnson PE, Millican ES, et al. Validation of highly discriminating multiplex short tandem repeat amplification systems for individual identification. Electrophoresis. 1996;17(8):1283–1293
  4. Tzeng CH, Lyou JY, Chen YR, Hu HY, Lin JS, Wang SY, et al. Determination of sibship by PCR-amplified short tandem repeat analysis in Taiwan. Transfusion. 2000;40:840–842
  5. Gaytmenn R, Hildebrand DP, Sweet D, Pretty IA. Determination of the sensitivity and specificity of sibship calculation using AmpFlSTR Profiler Plus. Int J Legal Med. 2002;116:161–164
  6. Evett IW. Strength of evidence in likelihood ratios. The use of statistics in forensic science. New York: Ellis Horwood; 1991;
  7. Riancho JA, Zarrabeitia A. window based software for common paternity and sibling analysis. Forensic Sci Int. 2003;135(3):232–234
  8. Coste Joël, Pouchot Jacques. A grey zone for quantitative diagnostic and screening tests. Int J Epidemiol. 2003;32:304–313
  9. Reid TM, Wolf CA, Kraemer CM, Lee SC, Baird ML, Lee RF. Specificity of sibship determination using the ABI Identifiler Multiplex System. J Forensic Sci. 2004;49(6):1262–1264
  10. Bhasin MK, Walter H, Danker-Hopfe H. The Distribution of Genetical, Morphological and Behavioural Traits among the Peoples of Indian Region. Delhi: Kamla-Raj; 1992, p. 14–35.
  11. Gadgil M, Joshi NV, Manoharan S, Patil S, Prasad UVS. Peopling of India. In:  Balasubramanian D,  Appaji Rao N editor. The Indian Human Heritage. Hyderabad Universities Press; 1998;p. 100–129
  12. Kapadia KM. Marriage and family in India. 2nd ed.. Calcutta: Oxford University Press; 1958;pp. 117–137
  13. Appaji Rao N, Savithri HS, Bittles AH. A genetic perspective on the South Indian tradition of consanguineous marriage. In:  Driesen CV,  Nandan S editor. Austral-Asian encounters. New Delhi: Prestige Books; 2002;p. 326–341
  14. Rao PSS. Inbreeding in India-concepts and consequences. In:  Lukacs JR editors. The People of India. New York: Plenum; 1984;p. 239–268
  15. Bamshad MJ. Genetic evidence on the origins of Indian caste populations. Genome Res. 2001;11:1574–1585

PII: S1353-1131(06)00186-6

doi: 10.1016/j.jcfm.2006.08.002

Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine
Volume 14, Issue 5 , Pages 261-265 , July 2007